Is the eruv valid when the baker explicitly names the payer and performs zikui (conferral) on his behalf through a third party?

ShabbatEruvinEruv Chatzerot

Synopsis

The Shulchan Aruch and most poskim hold that if the baker explicitly names the payer and transfers the eruv share to him via a third party (zikui), the eruv is valid. A minority opinion (Tosafot as understood by some Acharonim) disagrees, holding that the payer's initial intent to purchase with money vitiates all subsequent conferrals.

Rishonim
Early Acharonim
Late Acharonim
Lenient
Strict
Lesser cited
Major authority

Discussion

Discussion coming soon.

The Daily Law

One question. Every opinion. Every morning.

A new halakhic question and the full spectrum of rabbinic thought, delivered daily.